One of the tenets of Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity is that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. Light speed is considered the universal speed limit of everything, and this is widely accepted by the scientific community. But in science, if you make a hard-and-fast rule, someone will try to disprove it, or at least find a loophole. And the speed of light is no exception.
Light, in a vacuum, travels at approximately 299,792 kilometers per second (186,282 miles per second). In September 2011, physicists working on the Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus (OPERA) created a frenzy in the scientific community when they announced that their experiments resulted in subatomic particles called neutrinos traveling from the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) near Geneva, Switzerland to the Gran Sasso National Laboratory near L'Aquila, Italy and arriving around 60 nanoseconds earlier than a beam of light. Ideas as to either how these neutrinos could have actually broken the speed of light, or as to what errors could have caused the impossible results, abounded. Finally, equipment issues, including a loose cable, were discovered as likely culprits, and the results were declared erroneous. So no rewriting of Einstein's theories turned out to be necessary.
Other researchers are trying to bend the rules rather than break them. In fact, bending space-time is one theory of how superluminal – faster-than-light -- speeds in space travel might be reached. The idea is that space time could be contracted in front of a spaceship and expanded behind it, while the ship would remain stationary in a warp bubble that itself was moving faster than the speed of light. This concept was originally modeled by Mexican theoretical physicist Miguel Alcubierre in 1994 as a theoretical possibility, but one that would require a universe-sized amount of negative energy to power the phenomenon. It was later refined to requiring a planet-sized amount and then again to needing an amount around the size of the Voyager 1 space probe. Unfortunately, the negative energy would have to come from exotic matter that is difficult to come by, and we're currently only at the level of miniature lab experiments on warp drives. The math behind these theories is based on the laws of relativity, so theoretically it wouldn't be breaking the rules. The technology, if it ever exists, could also be used for going slower than light, but much faster than we can go now, which might be more practical.
Space travel is just one of the possible applications of reaching or exceeding the speed of light. Some scientists are working on doing the same for the purposes of much faster data transfer. Read on to find out about current data speeds and the potential for faster-than-light information.
Can data even travel at the speed of light?
Currently, most of our data travels through either copper wire or fiber optic cable. Even when we send data via our cell phones over radio waves, which also travel at light speed, it ends up traversing the wired networks of the Internet at some point. The two most common types of copper wire for long-distance information transfer are twisted pair (used first for telephony, and later for dial-up Internet and DSL), and coaxial cable (used for cable TV initially, then Internet and phone). Coaxial cable is the faster of the two. But still faster is fiber optic cable. Rather than using copper to conduct data in the form of electrical signals, fiber optic cable moves data as pulses of light.
The "in a vacuum" reference on the previous page regarding the speed of light is important. Light through fiber optic is not as fast as light through a vacuum. Light, when moving through just about any medium, is slower than the universal constant we know as the speed of light. The difference is negligible through air, but light can be slowed down considerably through other media, including glass, which makes up the core of most fiber optic cabling. The refractive index of a medium is the speed of light in a vacuum divided by the speed of light in the medium. So if you know two of those numbers, you can calculate the other. The index of refraction of glass is around 1.5. If you divide the speed of light (approximately 300,000 kilometers, or 186,411 miles, per second) by this, you get around 200,000 kilometers (124,274 miles) per second, which is the approximate speed of light through glass. Some fiber optic cabling is made of plastic, which has an even higher refractive index, and therefore a lower speed.
Part of the reason for the decrease in speed is the dual nature of light. It has the attributes of both a particle and a wave. Light is actually made up of particles called photons, and they do not move in a straight line through the cabling. As the photons hit molecules of material, they bounce in various directions. Light refraction and absorption by the medium eventually lead to some energy and data loss. This is why a signal can't travel indefinitely and has to be boosted periodically to cover long distances. However, the slowing of light isn't all bad news. Some impurities are added to fiber optics to control the speed and aid in channeling the signal effectively.
Fiber optic cable is still far faster than copper wire, and isn't as susceptible to electromagnetic interference. Fiber can achieve speeds of hundreds of Gigabits per second, or even Terabits. Home Internet connections don't achieve those super high speeds, at least partially because wiring is being shared by many households over entire areas, and even networks that use fiber optics generally have copper running the last stretch into people's homes. But with fiber running all the way to your neighborhood or home, you can get something in the range of 50 to 100 Megabits per second of data transfer, compared to 1 to 6 Megabits per second from average DSL lines and 25 or so Megabits per second from cable. Actual data speeds vary greatly by location, provider and your chosen plan, of course.
There are also other things that cause signal latency (delay), such as the back and forth communication required when you access a Web page or download data (handshaking). Your computer and the server housing the data are communicating to make sure they are synchronized and data transfer is successful, causing a delay, albeit a brief and necessary one. The distance your data has to travel will also affect how long it takes to get there, and there could be additional bottlenecks at any hardware and cabling the data has to travel through to get to its destination. A system is only as fast as its slowest component, and every millisecond counts in the days of seemingly (but not really) instant communication.
There have been recent breakthroughs in transferring data over copper wiring at nearly fiber optic speeds via reducing interference and other techniques. And researchers are also working on transmitting data via light through the air, say using lightbulbs for WiFi, or transmitting laser beams from building to building. Again, light through the air does move at close to light speed, but nothing we have now is surpassing the speed limit. Can we achieve actual faster-than-light transfer?
The Possibility of Superluminal Data Transfer
Scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) are claiming to have achieved faster-than-light transfer of quantum data using something called four-wave mixing, which incidentally is a phenomenon that's considered a form of interference in fiber optic lines. The experiment involves sending a short 200-nanosecond seed pulse through heated rubidium vapor and at the same time sending in a second pump beam at a different frequency to amplify the seed pulse. Photons from both beams interact with the vapor in a way that generates a third beam. Apparently, the peaks of both the amplified seed pulse and the newly generated pulse can exit faster than a reference beam traveling at the speed of light in a vacuum. The speed differences they reported were 50 to 90 nanoseconds faster than light through a vacuum. They even proclaimed being able to tune the speed of the pulses by altering the input seed detuning and power.
Another fast data transfer technology in the works is quantum teleportation, which relies on the existence of entangled pairs: two particles that are in tune with each other to the point that if you measure one, the other ends up with the same quality that you found in the first one, no matter their distance from one another. This also requires a third particle that contains the actual bits of data you are trying to transfer. A laser is used to teleport one of the entangled particles elsewhere, in a manner of speaking. It isn't really transporting a photon, but rather changing a new photon into a copy of the original. The photon in the entangled pair can be compared to the third photon to find their similarities or differences, and that information can be relayed to the other location and used for comparison with the twin particle to glean the data. This sounds like something that would result in instant transfer, but that's not the case. Laser beams only travel at the speed of light. But this has potential applications for sending encrypted data via satellite, and for networking quantum computers, should we ever invent them. And it's further along than any attempts at superluminal data transfer. It works over miles at this point, and researchers are trying to increase the teleportation distance.
The answer to whether meaningful information can travel faster than light is currently no. We're only at the level of moving a few quantum particles at speeds that may possibly be over the speed of light, if the data pans out on subsequent experiments. To have a practically applicable form of data transfer, you have to be able to send organized bits of data that mean something, uncorrupted, to another machine that can interpret it. The fastest transmission in the world will mean nothing otherwise. But you can be sure that if the speed of light is broken, we'll be applying it to our Internet transmissions far sooner than to interstellar travel. Our ability to watch the highest quality television and surf the net at the fastest speeds will be paramount. And perhaps for those purposes, even getting ourselves to truly as-fast-as-light transmission would do wonders.
Physics is a truly fascinating subject, as it attempts to find the answer to how everything in the universe works. Without the study of physics, we probably wouldn't have a lot of modern conveniences, for instance those that require electricity, or depend upon the behavior of waves of any sort (like just about every form of long distance communication). You certainly wouldn't be reading this right now. Without an understanding of physical laws, lifting a piano would be more difficult, video games wouldn't be as much fun (or exist), and cartoon animators wouldn't know what laws to break to make us laugh. And we certainly wouldn't have ventured into space, an ability we'll need if we discover, via astrophysics or a keen observer, that a planet-destroying asteroid is headed our way. Also, kudos to mathematics for making the study of physics possible. I will continue to sit back and reap the benefits made possible by all the hard-working mathematicians, physicists and engineers of the world.
- ABC Science. "Ask an Expert - Why is fibre optic technology 'faster' than copper?" (Nov. 24, 2012) http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2010/10/21/3044463.htm
- Alwayn, Vivek. "Optical Network Design and Implementation. Chapter: Fiber-Optic Technologies." Apr. 23, 2004. (Nov. 26, 2012) http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=170740
- America's Library. "Alexander Graham Bell Invented the Photophone - June 3, 1880." (Dec. 2, 2012) http://www.americaslibrary.gov/jb/gilded/jb_gilded_bell_1.html
- Anderson, Nate. "Copper wire as fast as fiber?" Ars Technica. Oct. 10, 2006. (Nov. 24, 2012) http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2006/10/7952/
- Anderson, Nate. "New life for twisted-pair? 500Mbps over copper wiring." Ars Technica. Mar. 16, 2009. (Nov. 25, 2012) http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2009/03/ericsson-500mbps-over-copper-wiring/
- Boyle, Rebecca. "Fed Up With Sluggish Neutrinos, Scientists Force Light To Move Faster Than Its Own Speed Limit." PopSci. May 3, 2012. (Nov. 26, 2012) http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-05/fed-sluggish-neutrinos-scientists-force-light-move-faster-its-own-speed-limit
- CBC News. "'Faster-than-light' data in doubt after new results." Mar. 19, 2012. (Nov. 15, 2012) http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2012/03/19/technology-faster-than-light-neutrinos-icarus.html
- CBC News. "'Faster-than-light' particles may have been even speedier." Feb. 23, 2012. (Nov. 15, 2012) http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2012/02/23/technology-faster-than-light-neutrinos-opera.html
- Ceurstemont, Sandrine. "One-Minute Physics: Why light slows down in glass." New Scientist TV. Oct. 24, 2011. (Nov. 30, 2012) http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2011/10/one-minute-physics-why-light-slows-down-in-glass.html
- Collins, Nick. "Speed of light 'broken' at CERN, scientists claim." The Telegraph. Sept. 22, 2011. (Nov. 30, 2012) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/8783011/Speed-of-light-broken-at-CERN-scientists-claim.html
- Condliffe, Jamie. "Did Scientists Really Just Break the Speed of Light?" Gizmodo. May 7, 2012. (Nov. 15, 2012) http://gizmodo.com/5908206/did-scientists-really-just-break-the-speed-of-light
- Das, Saswato R. "Was Einstein Wrong?" New York Times. Sept. 29, 2011. (Dec. 2, 2012) http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/30/opinion/30iht-eddas30.html
- Diaz, Jesus. "Ridiculous: A Loose Cable Caused Those 'Faster-Than-Light' Particles." Gizmodo. Feb. 22, 2012. (Nov. 15, 2012) http://gizmodo.com/5887398/a-loose-cable-caused-the-faster+than+light-particles-test
- Dillow, Clay. "Physicists Say Speed-of-Light Breaking Neutrinos Would've Lost Their Energy Along the Way." PopSci. Oct. 3, 2011. (Nov. 30, 2012) http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-10/physicists-say-speed-light-breaking-neutrinos-wouldve-lost-their-energy-along-way
- Dodson, Brian. "Warp drive looks more promising than ever in recent NASA studies." Gizmag. Oct. 3, 2012. (Nov. 27, 2012) http://www.gizmag.com/warp-drive-bubble-nasa-interstellar/24392/
- FCC. "Measuring Broadband America - July 2012." July 2012. (Dec. 2, 2012) http://www.fcc.gov/measuring-broadband-america/2012/july
- Fettweis, Alfred. "Can signals truly be faster than light?" Signal Processing. August 2003, Volume 83, Issue 8, Pages 1583-1596. (Nov. 20, 2012)
- Finnie, Matthew. "How clouds cheat the speed of light." The Guardian. Sept. 6, 2012. (Nov. 24, 2012) http://www.guardian.co.uk/media-network/media-network-blog/2012/sep/06/cloud-computing-speed-light-network
- Glasser, Ryan T, Ulrich Vogl, and Paul D. Lett. "Stimulated generation of superluminal light pulses via four-wave mixing." Apr. 3, 2012. (Nov. 20, 2012) http://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.0810v1.pdf
- Hartley, Darleen. "Data Faster Than the Speed of Light." BSN. June 27, 2012. (Nov. 30, 2012) http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2012/6/27/data-faster-than-the-speed-of-light.aspx
- Higginbotham, Stacey. "Kotura: A startup betting on the speed of light in the data center." GigaOM. Nov. 23, 2012. (Nov. 25, 2012) http://gigaom.com/cloud/kotura-a-startup-betting-on-the-speed-of-light-in-the-data-center/
- Hsu, Jeremy. "Spaceship Could Fly Faster Than Light." Space.com. Aug. 13, 2008. (Dec. 1, 2012) http://www.space.com/5725-spaceship-fly-faster-light.html
- Iannone, P. "Optical Communications." IEEE Photonics Society. (Nov. 24, 2012) http://www.photonicssociety.org/content/optical-communications
- Johnston, James H. "Internet With the Speed of Light." Legal Times. Volume XXV, Issue 45, Nov. 18, 2002. (Nov. 30, 2012) http://www.ieeeusa.org/communications/Massmedia/files/Internet%20With%20the%20Speed....pdf
- Kawalec, Tomasz. "Should we bother with the speed of light in everyday life? A closer look at GSM technology." Physics Education. Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 579-583. September 2012. (Nov. 15, 2012)
- Knapp, Alex. "Chinese Researchers Quantum Teleport Photons Over 60 Miles." Forbes. May 11, 2012. (Nov.25, 2012) http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2012/05/11/chinese-researchers-quantum-teleport-photons-over-60-miles/
- Lentine, A. "Optical Interconnects & Processing Systems." IEEE Photonics Society. (Nov. 24, 2012) http://www.photonicssociety.org/content/optical-interconnects-processing-systems
- Mann, Adam. "The Race to Bring Quantum Teleportation to Your World." Wired. Oct. 3, 2012. (Dec. 2, 2012) http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/10/quantum-satellite-teleportation/all/
- Mims, Christopher. "Achieving Fiber Optic Speeds over Copper Lines." MIT Technology Review. Apr. 22, 2012. (Nov. 25, 2012) http://www.technologyreview.com/news/418646/achieving-fiber-optic-speeds-over-copper-lines/
- Moskowitz, Clara. "Einstein's math may also describe faster-than-light velocities." Christian Science Monitor. Oct. 10, 2012. (Dec. 1, 2012) http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/1010/Einstein-s-math-may-also-describe-faster-than-light-velocities
- Page, Lewis. "US gov boffins achieve speeds FASTER THAN LIGHT - 'Loophole' found in Special Theory of Relativity." The Register. May 7, 2012. (November 15, 2012) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/07/faster_than_light_quantum/
- Pennsylvania State University. "Researchers push transmission rate of copper cables." Nov. 14, 2007. (Nov. 24, 2012) http://live.psu.edu/story/27265
- Plumb, Marisa. "Copper at the Speed of Fiber?" IEEE Spectrum. October 2011. (Nov. 25, 2012) http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/internet/copper-at-the-speed-of-fiber
- Quigley, Brian. "Speed of Light in Fiber - The First Building Block of a Low-Latency Trading Infrastructure." Technically Speaking. Apr. 7, 2011. (Nov. 30, 2012) http://blog.advaoptical.com/speed-light-fiber-first-building-block-low-latency-trading-infrastructure/
- Reich, Eugenie Samuel. "Neutrino experiment replicates faster-than-light finding." Nature. Nov. 18, 2011. (Nov. 15, 2012) http://www.nature.com/news/neutrino-experiment-replicates-faster-than-light-finding-1.9393
- Schneider, David. "Financial Trading at the Speed of Light." IEEE Spectrum. Oct. 2011. (Nov. 25, 2012) http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/it/financial-trading-at-the-speed-of-light
- Wrenn, Eddie. "Can we finally break the speed of light? Nasa breakthrough suggested Star Trek's 'warp drives' may not only be possible - but practical." Daily Mail. Sept. 18, 2012. (Dec. 1, 2012) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2204913/Nasa-breakthrough-suggests-Star-Treks-warp-drives-possible--practical.html
- Wright, Robert. "Richard Feynman on the Weirdness of Physical Reality." Video of lecture at Cornell University: The Character of Physical Law: Probability and Uncertainty - The Quantum Mechanical View of Nature - November 18, 1964. The Atlantic. July 11, 2012. (Nov. 30, 2012) http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/richard-feynman-on-the-weirdness-of-physical-reality/259718/